Rhetorical Analysis of President Roosevelts Pearl Harbor Speech

Rhetorical Analysis of electric chair Roosevelts os Harbor Speech The driblet Harbor address to the area is probably one of the most famous speeches make throughout time. In this essay I will evaluate the rhetorical effectiveness of Franklin Delano Roosevelts famous speech and show that his speech is a successful line of work for the unify States of America. I will focus on the speakers credibility, all the different appeals made throughout the speech, as well as the purpose and the audience of the speech. Also, I will discuss whether or not there are either logical fallacies that may have weakened his speech. President Roosevelt does a few specific things to be able to establish his credibility as a speaker. Since Roosevelt was the current death chair, the fall in States was inclined to listen to him and believe what he was saying. cosmos the president, the people knew that he was a apt source to receive selective information from. The president had also been appointed Assistant Secretary of the Navy in 1920. This shows that he had experience with the unify States military services and knew how to handle the Pearl Harbor situation. Roosevelt?s speech is short, but it still utilizes pathos, ethos, and logos and has further enough detail to let the world know what was leaving on. The antecedent of this essay is Franklin Delano Roosevelt. He was the president of the unify States at the time of the Pearl Harbor attack. The purpose of this speech was to inform the entire United States slightly what had happened the day before at Pearl Harbor. The nation was to be warned that the United States was going to declare war against Japan. The intended audience is e veryone in the United States. President Roosevelt ef... ... was a well-written and very credible speech that President Roosevelt gave to the United States of America. Through all the different appeals he makes a successful argument for declaring was. He ma kes many statements that could have only been made by psyche who really knew what was going on. With all the points he proves that he does know what he is talking about and that everyone should believe him. This speech gave just the right pith of information to be able to let people know what was going on without too much detail that may confuse them. The president did not commit logical fallacies in his speech. It was strictly facts and events that had taken place. The fact that there are no logical fallacies makes it a more credible speech, as well as a successful argument. So, this speech was very successful in the way that the ideas were put together and written.