The Biomedical Mode of Health

The bio medical exam simulation of wellness Introduction In wellness psychology it is seen that health is defined by variant com deputeer simulations. unitary such mold is the biomedical stick of health which revolves virtuall(a)y the spirit of a heavy soulify. The nonplus was introduced in the nineteenth blow and has been apply widely to diagnose infirmitys by the doctors. According to the model every disease or disorder is caused by a visible harm. In new(prenominal)(a) words the diseases or disorders be caused by germs or genes which might be changing the internal environment of the body to cause the disease.Although it has been introduced in the nineteenth century, the roots of the model date grit to the 17th century when Cartesian dualism existed. After its introduction the model replaced the antecedently famous humoral ikon in the twentieth century. The discovery of antibiotics proved to be a find in the approval of the model. However in the late twenti eth century some of the sociologists again started questioning the integrity of the biomedical model of health as they considered the social wellbeing of an individual to be as authoritative as the biological well being (Curtis 2002 Taylor 2008 Lovallo 2005 Havelka et al 2009).Biomedical Model of health The biomedical model of health induces its roots from the Cartesian Dualism which is dated back to the seventeenth century in the times of Descartes. Cartesian Dualism turn around the aspect that both mind and body atomic compute 18 dickens describe entities irrespective of their functions. In a similar fashion the model considers physical causes to be the main reason for the disease. The model has replaced the previously followed Humoral prototype which was formed by the Greeks.According to this paradigm the diseases in a kind body atomic number 18 caused by a current abnormality in the tetrad basic fluids of the body. In those times the four basic fluids of the body we re believed to be blood, b omit bile, yellow bile and phlegm. The treatment of this paradigm in like manner revolved around the maintenance of these four basic fluids. One thing that the Humoral paradigm and biomedical model of health cast off in earthy is that both of them consider bodily factors to be the cause of the disease (Curtis 2002).The biomedical model of health revolves around certain factors which have to be present. The model states that for a person to be unhealthy they have to have some sort of biological abnormality. It in any case states that every disease has some limited cause which has to be diagnosed by the doctor in order to recuperate the patient. It also involves the process of treatment and states that the human body female genitals be reversed back to the normal condition if the right treatment is served to the morbid person. It states that psychological and social processes do not take part in the disease do process. only it also assumes that mind and body are two various entities that have no such relation with each new(prenominal) and lastly the health of the whole society is dependent on the resources that are available to the medical society as a whole (Taylor 2008). The model is largely followed all over the population and its principles are also seen to be the most convincing these days. It is because of this model that researches are being conducted on the biochemical and genetic processes of the body to find out about the different diseases.Moreover all the doctors being trained these days are trained on the principles of this model as they have to learn about the internal environment of a human being so that they can treat them. In other words they have to understand the human body so that they can intervene in the process of disease that may be causing harm to the patient (Curtis 2002 Taylor & Field 2007). It has economic aided to carry out several proposals have proved to be a breakthrough in treating various diseases occurring in the society. The Human Genome Project is an object lesson of the advantages of this model.Human Genome Project was a project launched in the year 1990 by international authorities to find out the sequencing of the human genome along with the identification of the chemical base pairs. Human genomes are the genes which channel information about the here(predicate)ditary characteristics that an individual would possess. In human beings these are found in the form of genes located on the chromosomes. It is this human genome project which allowed the doctors to learn a lot about the structure of chromosomes, the proteins coded by the genes, and the number of genes in a human being.It has also made the surgeries safe and effective. Moreover it has also assisted in controlling the diseases occurring all over the world and this can be noticed in the statistics of morality in the different nations. The diseases which were previously considered to be untreatable can now be treated because of the intimacy acquired after the introduction of this model. As an example the cases of pneumonia and appendicitis can be considered which previously were untreatable. Pneumonia is a disease caused by the bacteria Pneumococcus and affects the lungs whereas appendicitis is the inflammation of the appendix.Pneumonia is a life threatening condition which could not be cured previously but nowadays it can be cured with the help of antibiotics. Appendicitis is also a lethal condition which can be cured with the help of surgery. (Taylor & Field 2007 Havelka et al 2009 Robbins et al 2005). Limitations of the Biomedical Model of Health The biomedical model of health has its own shortcomings and is termed as reductionist by the opponents. In other words it does not broaden its concept towards the factors other than genes and chemicals for example the factors relating to economic or social environment of the individual.This however is covered by the holistic get whic h takes the whole situation in consideration sooner taking a step. Similarly another factor that is mentioned is the relation of the model to the physical causes of the diseases concerned. The opponents point out that not all the diseases are related to physical causes but some of them are caused by a hoi polloi of the factors. An example of the heart disease atherosclerosis can be cited here in which the factors of genetics, diet, and lifestyle play a role (Curtis 2002).It is also criticized to be more related to the aspect of bent rather than preventing the disease. It is believed to be entirely ignoring the aspects of social and psychological variants which do have a role in the progression of a disease. The treatment process is also related to these variants and again this model does not take into consideration these variants because of which some treatments do not go successful (Taylor 2008). Lastly, the model emphasizes on the body in special(a) irrespective of the role t hat mind plays in the health of an individual.This aspect of the model can be denied because the research these days show that the mind plays a great role in influencing the body. Some diseases may be caused because the person may be living in unstable economic conditions and these conditions are not taken into consideration by the model. An example can be cited here in the therapies that are recommended for people who are suffering from different diseases. For example the cognitive therapy recommended for patients suffering from cancer. Cognitive therapy is recommended in the treatment of certain cancers as individuals undergoing he treatment suffer from symptoms like pain, memory loss, lack of concentration, irrational behaviour and mood swings. Cognitive therapies can help in relieving all these symptoms as shown by different researches. (Curtis 2002 Scipio et al 2006). Conclusion The biomedical model of health has been questioned by many sociologists as it does not take the aspe ct of social well being in its exposition. Health is a factor which is dependent on all the aspects of life as put down by the sociologists.Economic and social factors should also be considered when analyzing the health of an individual. These factors also determine the emotions of an individual and hence the person can be sociologically disincline. In other words it is not necessary for a healthy person to be sociologically fit in the current definition of the biomedical model of health. In the latter half of the twentieth century it was realized that the biomedical model of health can be utilize to the ones who are diseased biologically but not the ones who are unfit by other means.This approach therefore led to the adaptation of a new approach known as holistic approach. It is seen that nowadays the biomedical model is adopted for curing purposes along with other factors of society when curing a disease (Curtis 2002 Taylor & Field 2007 Derick & Halligan 1970 Checkland et al 20 08). References Lovallo, W. R. , & Lovallo, W. R. (2005). Stress & health biologic and psychological interactions. Thousand Oaks, Calif Sage Publications. Checkland, K. , Harrison, S. , McDonald, R. , Grant, S. , Campbell, S. , & Guthrie, B. (January 01, 2008).Biomedicine, holism and general medical practice responses to the 2004 General Practitioner contract. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30, 5, 788-803. Havelka, M. , Lucanin, J. D. , & Lucanin, D. (January 01, 2009). Biopsychosocial modelthe integrated approach to health and disease. Collegium Antropologicum, 33, 1, 303-10. Taylor, S. E. (2008). Health psychology. New York McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Curtis, A. J. (2002). Health psychology. London Routledge. Taylor, S. , & Field, D. (2007). Sociology of health and health care. Oxford Blackwell Pub.Wade, Derick T, & Halligan, Peter W. (1970). Do biomedical models of illness make for unspoiled healthcare systems?. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. Kumar, Vinay, Abul K. Abbas, Nelson Fa usto, Stanley L. Robbins, and Ramzi S. Cotran. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease. Philadelphia Elsevier Saunders, 2005. Abernethy AP, Keefe FJ, McCrory DC, Scipio CD, Matchar DB. Behavioural therapies for the management of cancer pain a systematic review. In Flor H, Kalso E, Dostrovsky JO, editors. Proceedings of the eleventh World Congress on Pain. Seattle IASP Press 2006. p. 78998.