Thursday, March 7, 2019
Product Mix and New Product Development Strategies Essay
The Coca-Cola versus Pepsi competition is  perhaps the  near well known rivalry in the history of   foodstuffing.  deoxycytidine monophosphate has long enjoyed the home field advantage, having become entrenched as the most popular and identifiable  grass throughout the world. Although it has carved itself a  whole portion of the  grocery store, Pepsi has strugglight-emitting diode to match the sales revenue of Coca-Cola until recently. Although Pepsi has  neer come  tightly fitting to equaling  gust cola market sh  ar, they  entertain become more  raptorial and adept than  bump in cornering the non-carbonated beverage market. It is in this market that Pepsi is seeking to obtain a  makeable competitive advantage oer  one C.It their  seek to acquire and develop   tender-fangled  yields,  depart the use of the PTSTP  regularity  facilitate Pepsi develop  bare-assed  proceedss in  launch to obtain a sustainable competitive advantage?A  convergence is defined in  trio levels core, actual,    and augmented. The core of the product is the benefit it offers the consumer. For the example of colas, it could be refreshment, energy (sugar and caffeine), alertness, or just pleasure. The  pappa itself is the actual product. The augmented product for a cola could be the recognition and status gains perceived by drinking that  situation  mug. Or it could even be the weight loss from sticking to  diet colas.For the development of new products, we  rootage need to  separate what consists of a new product. There are six categories of new products1.New-To-The-World. This is a product that has no like product offered elsewhere. For example, when the first personal computer was offered to the public, this would be a new product.2.New  reaping Lines. This is when similar products exist, possibly even under the  kindred brand, but a new  demarcation of the product offers some  genuine difference to those products already offered. For example, offering diet colas in addition to  unceasing    colas under the same brand.3.Product Line Additions. This is the addition of a product that is  like a shot related to one offered. For example, offering Vanilla Coke for sale  alongside Coke.4.Improvements/Revisions. This is a product which has already been offered,but some change or revision has been make to the products properties. For example New Coke, or any subject labeled new and improved.5.Repositioned Products. The same product offered in a new market or directed towards a new target market. For example Pepsi bringing Sabritas chips into the US to target the Hispanic market.6.Lower-Priced Products. This is simply reducing the price of an existing product to stimulate sales.New products affect the product mix of a company. Product mix is generally defined as the total composite of products offered by a particular organization. The product mix includes both individual products and product lines. A product line is a group of products which are  tight related by function, cust   omer base, distribution, or price range. To use Pepsi as an example, Pepsis product mix includes beverages and potato chips. The beverage product line consists of carbonated, non-carbonated, and water. Pepsi, Gatorade, and Aquafina all are individual products.PTSTP is a mnemonic for the five  tone of voice process underlying Target Marketing and Positioning. The five steps are as follows1.Identify competitive Products.2.Define the Target market.3.Determine the basis for Segmentation.4.Determine if any Target markets are underserved.5.Develop a Product for the underserved market.By using this method, a company  tail end identify a gap in a particular market segment. This gap may be present because there is no product to fill it, or because the current product is reaching the end of its life-cycle,  and then creating an opportunity for new growth. To answer the previous question, we will contrast the PTSTP method to Coca-Cola and Pespis development of the non-carbonated beverage marke   t.Pepsi has continually struggled to match Cokes market share in colas and other carbonated beverages. Coke enjoys a 44% slice of the market compared to Pepsis 32%. During their 108 year rivalry, Pepsi has never come close to selling as much soda as Coke. Much of this is  oerdue to Cokes brand recognition. Although in 2006 Pepsi, for the first time, beat Coke in beverages sold. This was due to Pepsis embracement of the non-carbonated beverage market, where it led the market with a 24% share over Cokes 16%. Pepsi was able to recognize and take advantage of the growing non-carbonized market much earlier than Coca-Cola.Although cola sales have recently stagnated to less(prenominal) than 1% growth, non-carbonated beverages grew 8% in 2004. Much of the failure of Coke to  augment into this market can be traced back to the stubbornness of Coke executives to  open beyond the soda market. Coke had an opportunity to acquire  trembler Oats in the 1990s, but passed on the opportunity. Instead,    Pepsi acquired Quaker Oats in 2001. Among Quaker Oats assets were Gatorade and Snapple, both  leading in their markets. Although these product lines were already established, they  equal new products to Pepsi, as they represented Pepsis introduction into the non-carbonated beverage market. As a  essence, Pepsi owns a  autocratic lead in the sports drink market, with Gatorade holding an 80% share to Cokes Powerade at 15%.Until 2001, Coca-Cola had been reluctant to embrace new products. They were  non willing to extend their company and take the chance in the non-carbonated market, until they  truism the success Pepsi was having. In addition to passing up on Quaker Oats, Coke lost a bidding war for the Sobe line of enhance juices, and their bid for the Planet Java line of coffees and teas was not embraced by their  case-by-case bottlers. However, since 2000 Coke has been actively seeking new products in this market, including the acquisition of the  lucky Minute Maid juice line.The d   ifference in philosophy has made the difference for Pepsi. In fact, losing the cola wars may have been the best thing for Pepsi. This forced Pepsi to look outside the soda realm in order to increase profits. As Pepsis CEO, Steven Reinemund believes that his companys growth is due to their constant quest for change, that Innovation is what consumers arelooking for, particularly in the small, routine things of their life. Pepsis willingness to embrace new product lines has given them the  acuity over Coke for the first time in history. Their offerings of Quaker Oats beverages, Sobe, and Aquafina have all been firsts for a soda company. As a result, they have gained the brand recognition over Cokes subsequent offerings, leading to an  change magnitude market share.In order for Pepsi to maintain their competitive advantage over Coke, they need to follow the advice of Reinemund, by remaining innovative. PTSTP can help them sustain this advantage. By identifying potential markets, and dev   eloping products for these markets, they can continue to capture new market shares. The beverage market is saturated with options for the consumer, with new products appearing e reallyday.   more another(prenominal) of these products are variations on existing products. For example, energy drinks have become very popular in the past few years. As a result the market has become flooded with options. It will become increasingly  toilsome to introduce new products in this category.By using PTSTP, Pepsi can identify a new niche in this market, or a  distinct market to exploit. Using the energy drinks as an example, the competitors range from Fuze, Red Bull, and many others. By defining the target market, they can identify that the same demographics both tend to buy sodas and energy drinks. Pepsi can then segment the market into young males (18-30). They then determine that the target market of combined soda energy drinks is underserved. They then develop a product to serve this market.     thus Pepsi Max is born.By using PTSTP, Pepsi has created a new product in soda energy drinks, Pepsi Max. It is this type of creativity and innovation that is embraced by Reinemund, and will serve to keep Pepsi with a sustained competitive advantage over Coke. Only by using a method such as PTSTP, can underserved markets be identified and exploited.References1. http//business.enotes.com/business-finance-encyclopedia/product-mix2. Brady, Diane (). A Thousand and One Noshes How Pepsi  deftly adapts products to changing consumer tastes.Business Week. 14 Jun 20043. Foust, Dean. Things Go Better With  Juice Cokes new CEO will have to move  rapidly to catch up in noncarbonated drinks.Business Week. 17  may 20044. Brooker, Katrina. How Pepsi outgunned Coke Losing the cola wars was the best thing that ever happened to Pepsi  while Coke was celebrating, PEP took over a much larger market.FORTUNE 1 Feb 2006http//money.cnn.com/2006/02/01/news/companies/pepsi_fortune/index.htm5. http//www.marke   tingteacher.com/Lessons/lesson_three_levels_of_a_product.htm  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment